-
Re: Maths glyphs in a non-maths font?
I omit the special ch.s (not the operators) in actual display or fun fonts. In all other, if in doubt, include them. The only laborious one to draw is the Omega. And don’t forget the µ does also belo…2 -
Re: Language support & character set standards: how do foundries label their Latin-based products today?
I agree to the notion that it is tricky to give the long answer on the matter, because a common understanding of the underlying definitions – does hardly exist. Fontspring lists e.g. Arapaho, Cebuano…2 -
Re: Eau de Garamond — a sans distilled from the essence of Garamond
The rhythmic pattern strong-light-strong-light… is essential for Latin capitals and should be maintained wherever possible (in those styles where this applies). This is what does not work yet here. S…3 -
Re: The Number sign—now and then—across languages.
The inclination of the glyph (and also the width) is indeed a subtle issue. And also the question of wether and how much the stems should descend from the baseline. As I said, I lean towards an uprig…1 -
Re: The Number sign—now and then—across languages.
I prefer often to have it straight upright in a Regular font, vs. slanted in an Italic. The horizontal bars are basically just horizontal. A horizontal stress is sort of standard, I’d say.This is how…3
